It is the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong and is conferred by the sovereign authority which organizes the court and defines its powers. Jurisdiction over the offense or over the subject matter refers to the power of […]
Daily Archives: November 6, 2010
48 posts
The requisites for a valid exercise of criminal jurisdiction are: 1. Jurisdiction over the person of the accused 2. Jurisdiction over the territory where the offense was committed 3. Jurisdiction over the offense (subject matter)
Criminal jurisdiction is the authority to hear and try a particular offense and impose the punishment for it. In People of the Philippines vs Mariano (71 SCRA 660), it is defined as the authority to hear and decide a particular offense and impose the corresponding punishment for it. In […]
Venue is defined as the particular country or geographical area in which a court with jurisdiction may hear and determine a case. It means the place of trial. On the other hand, jurisdiction is the power of the court to decide the case on the merits. Venue is thus […]
Jurisdiction (in general) is the power or authority given by the law to a court or tribunal to hear and determine certain controversies. It is the power of courts to hear and determine a controversy involving rights which are demandable and enforceable.
G.R. No. L-30026 – 37 SCRA 420 – Political Law – Constitutional Law – Bill of Rights – Equal Protection – Hernandez Doctrine Mario Gumabon et al were charged with rebellion punished under Art. 134 of the Revised Penal Code. Their offense was complexed with multiple murder, robbery, arson, […]
Yes, unlike jurisdiction over the offense which is conferred by law or the Constitution, jurisdiction over the person of the accused may be waived. For example, any objection to the procedure leading to the arrest must be opportunely raised before the accused enters his plea, or it is deemed […]
Jurisdiction over the person of the accused is acquired upon his arrest or upon his voluntary appearance or submission to the court.
Jurisdiction over the whole complex crime is lodged with the trial court having jurisdiction to impose the maximum and more serious penalty on an offense forming part of the complex crime.
Regular courts refer to civil courts as opposed to military courts or courts martial. Military courts have no jurisdiction over civilians.
G.R. No. 105371 – 227 SCRA 703 – Political Law – Constitutional Law – Bill of Rights – Equal Protection – Franking Privilege of the Judiciary Section 35 of Republic Act No. 7354 authorized the Philippine Postal Corporation (PPC) to withdraw franking privileges from certain government agencies. Franking privilege […]
1. Exclusive original jurisdiction in all criminal cases not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any court, tribunal or body, except those falling under the exclusive and concurrent jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan. All criminal cases where the penalty is higher than 6 years, including government-related cases wherein the accused is […]
1. Exclusive original jurisdiction over all violations of city or municipal ordinances committed within their respective territorial jurisdiction; 2. Exclusive original jurisdiction over all offenses punishable with imprisonment not exceeding 6 years regardless of the fine and other accessory penalties and civil liability 3. Offenses involving damage to property […]
Where the court has no jurisdiction, lower courts should simply dismiss the case. On the other hand, the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals may refer the case to the court of proper jurisdiction.
The principle of Adherence of Jurisdiction means that once jurisdiction is vested in the court, it is retained up to the end of the litigation. It remains with the court until the case is finally terminated. The exception to this is where a subsequent statute changing the jurisdiction of […]
G.R. No. L-6355-56 – 93 Phil. 699 – Political Law – The Judiciary – The Legislature – Separation of PowersStatutory Construction – Who May Interpret Laws Saturnino David, the then Collector of Internal Revenue (CIR), ordered the taxing of Justice Pastor Endencia’s and Justice Fernando Jugo’s (and other judges’) […]